Trader Joe’s Wants You To Know Your Eggs
Kudos to trader Joe’s for posting this up in the dairy section of their store (photo taken at the Trader Joe’s on Ontario St. in Chicago):
I’ve written before about the need for access to information about environmental impact and sustainability at the point of purchase, and this is a great example of a company that puts this very valuable information right out in the open.
I like how TJ’s is not hiding behind vague and misleading terms such as “all-natural.” Ambiguity leaves the conscious consumer unsure as to whether the food is organic or not, and whether the chickens which laid them had access to the outdoors or just had a glimpse of the outdoors from inside the barn in which they were cooped up. Ultimately, a company benefits from a consumer-base which is fully educated in their decision making, and chooses to come back to a particular store because items are clearly labeled, obviating the need for any guesswork (or guilt) associated with the origins of their food.
Ideally, we’d all live in a place where adjectives such as “organic” and “humanely raised” didn’t need to be called out as a special case, because all food was raised and processed in a manner which is kind to the animals and healthy to the humans who consume them. But we don’t. So if eggs aren’t organic, or if beef doesn’t come from cows who freely roamed in pasture … then that’s fine… but the price should reflect the quality of the product. It’s all too common for corporations to greenwash consumers into spending money with marketing gimmicks which leverage the current eco zeitgiest.
I would hope that other companies follow — and continue to push the boundaries — of this transparency exemplified by Trader Joe’s (and I’m sure they’re not the first to have done this). Eventually, I’d love to see a tag attached to each and every piece of produce or livestock that I eat which tells me where it came from, how far it travelled to get to my grocery store, what agricultural practices were used in raising/growing it, etc. To a limited extent, they have these for clothes already … why can’t they have it for food (it’d get stuck in your teeth, maybe?!?)?
Update 9/18/2008: Great article in the New York Times about egg labeling.
Related posts:












September 9th, 2008 at 11:09 pm
I did a little more research about Trader Joe’s history with eggs, and apparently, up until 2005, their record wasn’t so great; they bought eggs from farms that used an inhumane method of caging called “battery caging,” which leaves hens with no space to stretch their wings or turn around.
In 2005, after this was exposed, the Human Society of the United States convinced Trader Joe’s to agree to the following stipulations:
I wonder if the sign is a reaction to that? I guess it’s good that they don’t use farms which engage in battery caging any more, but it’s disturbing that it took the HSUS to convince them that this was something they should care about ….
September 20th, 2008 at 9:36 pm
[...] previously written about Trader Joe’s transparency in egg labeling terms (they have a poster with definitions [...]