<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Twitter to Support Making Eco-Conscious Decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/</link>
	<description>:: lost at the intersection of technology, design and user experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:49:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trader Joe&#8217;s Wants You To Know Your Eggs :: Focus + Context</title>
		<link>http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Trader Joe&#8217;s Wants You To Know Your Eggs :: Focus + Context</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/?p=65#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] written before about the need for access to information about environmental impact and sustainability at the point [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about the need for access to information about environmental impact and sustainability at the point [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/?p=65#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the suggestions, Chris. I like the idea of using some combination of #username and #threadtopic for a completely out-of-the-box implementation of &#039;channels&#039; by leveraging Twitter&#039;s existing infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the suggestions, Chris. I like the idea of using some combination of #username and #threadtopic for a completely out-of-the-box implementation of &#8216;channels&#8217; by leveraging Twitter&#8217;s existing infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/?p=65#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Also consider the value of hashtags when using or subscribing to Twitter Search results (http://search.twitter.com). If you append #inagreenpickle to your tweet, anyone searching or subscribed to &#039;inagreenpickle&#039; search results will be able to find or receive those updates without having to follow the @inagreenpickle user.

This also means more people can participate by emulating others without having to do any preliminary setup.

Finally, there&#039;s a service that lets you turn a feed into text messages -- so you could take the Twitter search results and get them via SMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also consider the value of hashtags when using or subscribing to Twitter Search results (<a href="http://search.twitter.com)" rel="nofollow">http://search.twitter.com)</a>. If you append #inagreenpickle to your tweet, anyone searching or subscribed to &#8216;inagreenpickle&#8217; search results will be able to find or receive those updates without having to follow the @inagreenpickle user.</p>
<p>This also means more people can participate by emulating others without having to do any preliminary setup.</p>
<p>Finally, there&#8217;s a service that lets you turn a feed into text messages &#8212; so you could take the Twitter search results and get them via SMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/?p=65#comment-70</guid>
		<description>@THD: Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately, I am no longer working on the diabetes project, but if you drop me an email, I can put you in touch with a colleague of mine who is still working on it, and she can fill you in and point you to any relevant academic publications, etc.

@Chris: Excellent points. There is a huge difference between qualitative/subjective information and direct answers to targeted questions, and I think that there is a place for both. There may be a single right answer to &quot;which fish is more sustainable&quot; but it also may be nice to get people&#039;s opinions on less clearly-defined questions, judgement calls, etc (though this tends to support the phenomenon confirmation bias). The Climate Counts approach is a very compelling one, and like Twitter, does an excellent job of leveraging an existing technology to provide curated answers to well-defined questions; I&#039;ll update this post with descriptions of some of the other services I&#039;ve since found out the Mobile Commons technology enables (which I definitely plan on using!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@THD: Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately, I am no longer working on the diabetes project, but if you drop me an email, I can put you in touch with a colleague of mine who is still working on it, and she can fill you in and point you to any relevant academic publications, etc.</p>
<p>@Chris: Excellent points. There is a huge difference between qualitative/subjective information and direct answers to targeted questions, and I think that there is a place for both. There may be a single right answer to &#8220;which fish is more sustainable&#8221; but it also may be nice to get people&#8217;s opinions on less clearly-defined questions, judgement calls, etc (though this tends to support the phenomenon confirmation bias). The Climate Counts approach is a very compelling one, and like Twitter, does an excellent job of leveraging an existing technology to provide curated answers to well-defined questions; I&#8217;ll update this post with descriptions of some of the other services I&#8217;ve since found out the Mobile Commons technology enables (which I definitely plan on using!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris m.</title>
		<link>http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>chris m.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/?p=65#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Ah, the idea of the LazyTweet. Have you thought about tying a twitter-bot using GroupTweet into something like Yahoo Answers?

I think the issue is whether you want qualitative information from individuals or you want to establish a trusted source of information. Many non-profits exist to supply quality information, and that is what Climate Counts is doing through their mobile program (powered by Mobile Commons, my company).

I also think that non-profits, news sources, and brands do need to find better ways to join and participate in the conversation. Climate Counts database-driven approach is the beginning of always accessible point-of-purchase information.

I think the implementation issue with crowd-sourcing via twitter is lowering the noise ratio. It would probably make sense to use a hash-tag (#080808) in addition to group tweet so that you only post topical things to a given community.

Cheers,
-chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the idea of the LazyTweet. Have you thought about tying a twitter-bot using GroupTweet into something like Yahoo Answers?</p>
<p>I think the issue is whether you want qualitative information from individuals or you want to establish a trusted source of information. Many non-profits exist to supply quality information, and that is what Climate Counts is doing through their mobile program (powered by Mobile Commons, my company).</p>
<p>I also think that non-profits, news sources, and brands do need to find better ways to join and participate in the conversation. Climate Counts database-driven approach is the beginning of always accessible point-of-purchase information.</p>
<p>I think the implementation issue with crowd-sourcing via twitter is lowering the noise ratio. It would probably make sense to use a hash-tag (#080808) in addition to group tweet so that you only post topical things to a given community.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
-chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THD</title>
		<link>http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/2008/08/10/twitter-eco-friendly-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>THD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangreenblatt.com/blog/?p=65#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Nice post. You refer to the diabetes project you are working on - any chance you will do a detailed post on that and any results you might have or implications for patients? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. You refer to the diabetes project you are working on &#8211; any chance you will do a detailed post on that and any results you might have or implications for patients? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

